Things sure have evolved a lot during the last few years. Smartphone manufacturers have recently been working 24/7 in order to come up with new ideas for their own devices, enabling them to help claim top spot. In the beginning of this year, LG was the first manufacturer ever to come up with a 3D glasses-free smart phone (Optimus 3D) and created a huge media frenzy as a result. It didn't take HTC long to check out the capabilities that like smartphone could
hello kitty backpacks bring to your table, and as a result, HTC's Evo 3D was born. Well, we thought that it would be a good idea to put these two pioneer handsets in the arena and see the one that will prevail as king of 3D phones.
Starting with the form and design with the handsets, it seems obvious they may have plenty of similarities, most likely following in Samsung's footsteps along with the Galaxy S II, targeting thinner, longer lg optimus and even more angular devices, which constitutes a thing in our opinion. The dimensions of the handsets are the following - LG Optimus a model in 3d measures in at 128. 8 back button 68 x 11. 9 mm and weighs 168g although HTC Evo 3D gets the following numbers: 126 back button 65 x 12. 1 mm, 170g. Once we said, there isn't room for differentiation here. As far as the visual style is concerned, the Optimus 3D carries a small problem. LG opt for chunky metal bar on the back panel to arranged the dual cameras and also etched a ''3D Stereoscope" for it which really doesn't look so good. In the meantime, HTC's arrangement will be much more subtle, integrating perfectly with your nice design of the rest of the handset, while keeping low profile. As a result, this first round visits the Evo 3D.
Moving to the display - the new kid around, the Evo 3D contains a 4. 3-inch capacitive LCD touchscreen technology running at 540 x 960 resolution featuring multi-touch input, accelerometer as well as being the HTC Sense user interface. Its competitor, the Optimus 3D boasts a 4. 3 inch capacitive LCD touchscreen, but which has a smaller 480 x 800 resolution with zero multi-touch. Although it functions the LG 3D URINARY INCONTINENCE, and features the typical accelerometer and sensors, the Optimus 3D will lose this second round as well, due to lower resolution screen and the issue of additional features such since multi-touch. Winner - HTC Evo a model in 3d again.
Operating system may be the next chapter of some of our comparison and things are with relative ease at this part. Due to the fact both handsets run Android 2. 3 Gingerbread and either are announced as eligible candidates to take delivery of the upcoming Android 4. 0 Ice Cream Sandwich upgrade, we have no selection but to declare this round as a draw.
Let's now take a look at the 'engines' of these 3D smartphones. The processor relating to the Optimus 3D is some sort of 1GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 functioning the TI OMAP4430 chipset and featuring a PowerVR SGX540 graphics digesting unit (GPU). In the mean time, HTC decided to pick a 1. 2 GHz Qualcomm MSM8660 dual-core processor in the Snapdragon chipset and through an Adreno 220 GPU. We personally like the Cortex-A9 inside Optimus but these new Snapdragon processors are really the top notch, helping the Evo 3D win yet another round.
When it pertains storage things don't look so good for the Evo 3d. It only comes which includes a 1GB or 4GB associated with internal room, while the Optimus packs a much better 8GB. Both handsets support microSD cards of up to 32GB. As far as being the RAM side is worried, the Evo makes up for the shortness in storage with its 1GB of RAM compared to the 512MB that this Optimus has. This is the perfect round in which we would like to unite these handsets and create them into one. The Evo 3D has twice as much RAM as the Optimus 3D nevertheless LG handset has a higher onboard storage capacity that's also something we appreciate highly lately. It's a classic draw, no doubt about that.
Apps - as people said, both devices operate Android 2. 3 Gingerbread and as a consequence, have access to 1000s of apps through the Google android Marketplace. Due to their own fairly powerful processors, neither handset should knowledge difficulties in running the vast majority of apps and games which can be currently available. At the moment, there isn't a huge selection of 3D specific apps and games from which to choose, but as time goes by, surely both handsets are able to fully benefit from their own 3D capability. This round ends in another draw.
Camera smart, the handsets are naturally dependent upon their clever 3D wizardry. Both the Evo and Optimus models need two stereoscopic camera arrangements in order to capture the 3D glasses-free images and videos. Starting off along with the Evo 3D - it features a primary dual 5MP arrange at 2560 x 1920 resolution, but 3D stereoscopic images are captured at turning at about 2MP. Video capture is 2D at 1080p together with in 3D at 720p. Features such as geo-tagging together with LED flash are present as well as a secondary 1. 3MP video camera. The LG Optimus 3D gets the same dual 5MP digital cameras which also capture at 2560 x 1920 resolution, 1080p in 2D together with 720p in 3D, with the same LED flash, geo-tagging and secondary camera capabilities. As you can easily tell, since both devices use a similar specialized setup, the result can only end in the draw.